Victim of Medical Malpractice at Kaiser?
Choose a Firm That Was Created to Advocate for Victims.The majority of Vaage Law’s Kaiser medical malpractice cases involve failure to diagnose, failure to order proper tests/scans, or failure to refer to a specialist. We are the experienced team you need to seek justice.

Medical malpractice is the third leading cause of death in the United States. In Southern California, the healthcare management consortium known as Kaiser Permanente uses gatekeepers to control costs. These gatekeepers can be nurse practitioners or primary care physicians, who control referrals for testing, radiology imaging, and specialists.
Kaiser’s cost control measures can lead to misdiagnosis, failure to diagnose, and other forms of life-threatening medical malpractice. In such cases, it is important for patients or their loved ones to seek the assistance of a Kaiser malpractice lawyer. We at Vaage Law can help individuals and families navigate the complex legal system to seek compensation for the harm they have suffered.
If you have been harmed by suspected medical malpractice while under the care of Kaiser Permanente, it is crucial to consult with a San Diego Kaiser malpractice attorney as soon as possible. Reach out to Vaage Law at (619) 338-0505 — we can investigate your injury and provide the experienced guidance and support needed to navigate this difficult situation to a satisfactory resolution.
“There simply aren’t enough words to say how wonderful my experience was with Vaage Law. As a firm, they are a complete rarity in today’s world—a true “unicorn” practice that combines top-tier legal expertise with genuine heart, deep empathy, and humanity.
They don’t just treat you like a case file; they make sure you are seen, heard, and recognized, and that you never feel alone in an overwhelming and frightening process. If you need a legal team that brings both exceptional skill and genuine care to your corner, I cannot recommend Vaage Law enough.”
– Kelly H. | Client
Can You Sue Kaiser for Malpractice?
You may be able to sue Kaiser or any healthcare provider for malpractice if you believe they’ve provided substandard care that led to harm or injury. However, whether your case will be successful depends on various factors such as the specifics of the care provided, the standard of care in the medical community, the extent of harm caused, and whether there’s evidence of negligence or wrongdoing.
It’s crucial to consult with a qualified San Diego Kaiser medical malpractice lawyer who is experienced in medical malpractice cases with Kaiser specifically. We can assess the details of your situation, document proof of claims, and guide your case through the legal process.
So while you may be able to bring a claim against Kaiser Permanente for medical malpractice, it’s important to note that the process is different from a typical lawsuit. As a member of Kaiser Permanente, you usually cannot sue for medical negligence in a court of law. Instead, you must go through a binding arbitration process described in the next section.
Common Issues With Kaiser Permanente
Kaiser Permanente operates as an integrated, closed-network health plan where the insurer, hospitals, and medical groups all sit under one corporate umbrella. While this system aims to streamline healthcare, its managed-care structure creates severe systemic pressure.
Across San Diego facilities, patients routinely encounter breakdown points in care:
Cost-Cutting “Gatekeepers” & Limited Specialist Access
Kaiser relies heavily on primary care providers and nurse practitioners to act as gatekeepers. Because the system absorbs the cost of diagnostic testing and outside consultations, gatekeepers face strict internal metrics to limit referrals. Patients with complex or subtle symptoms, such as early signs of a spinal cord tumor, localized infection, or internal bleeding, often face repeated denials or lengthy delays before seeing a specialist.
Overcrowding, Staffing Shortages & Rushed Appointments
High patient volumes across San Diego County force doctors to manage heavy daily caseloads. When clinicians are pressed to complete visits in 10 to 15 minutes, they may miss crucial details in a patient’s history, skip physical exams, or dismiss severe pain as minor, leading to devastating misdiagnoses.
Delayed Diagnostics & Test Approval Obstacles
Getting an MRI, CT scan, or specialized lab work within the Kaiser network often requires clearing several administrative hurdles. When emergency departments or urgent care facilities delay ordering immediate imaging for spinal trauma, stroke, or severe head injuries, the window for effective medical intervention can close permanently.
Administrative Errors & Communication Breakdown
In an integrated system with thousands of employees, handoffs between shift doctors, triage nurses, surgeons, and outpatient care managers frequently fail.
Poor communication during hospital discharges or department transfers often results in patients receiving wrong instructions, missed critical medication updates, or unaddressed lab anomalies.
Siloed Electronic Health Records & “Anchoring Bias”
While Kaiser uses a unified computer system (HealthConnect), clinicians often use auto-fill tools or cut-and-paste notes from prior visits to save time. If an initial provider incorrectly labels a patient’s condition (for example, diagnosing a herniated spinal disc as a simple “muscle strain”), that error gets “anchored” into the chart. Subsequent doctors tend to rely on the old note rather than re-evaluating the patient, allowing life-threatening conditions to progress unchecked.
How to Sue Kaiser for Malpractice
If you’re a member of Kaiser Permanente and believe you have a medical malpractice claim, you typically cannot sue directly in court. This is generally due to the binding arbitration agreement that all Kaiser patients sign upon membership. Instead, you must go through Kaiser’s arbitration process.
Here’s a general outline of the process:
- Arbitration: This is an alternative to the traditional court-based lawsuit system. The case is tried before a neutral third party (the arbitrator), who decides the case and determines what kind of compensation the plaintiff should receive, if any.
- Pre-Arbitration Process: Just like with standard personal injury litigation, the arbitration process involves the parties asking for and exchanging information (“discovery”) as well as other pre-trial processes like settlement conferences.
- Filing a Claim: An injured Kaiser patient must submit a demand for arbitration to the administrator. The demand must provide: (1) a short statement describing the patient’s injury and how Kaiser is responsible, and (2) the amount of money the patient is seeking. Also included should be the patient’s name, address, and telephone number, the attorney’s contact information, and the names of any and all specific individuals the patient believes are responsible for the injury.
The arbitration itself does not involve a judge or jury, just the parties, their representatives, and the neutral arbitrator. It’s recommended to consult with a San Diego Kaiser malpractice attorney to understand your rights and the best course of action before and during arbitration.
Types of Medical Errors a San Diego Kaiser Malpractice Attorney Can Help You With
Medical negligence inside a massive managed-care network can happen in any department, from primary care facilities to specialized surgical suites.
Specific pattern failures occur across Kaiser’s Southern California locations. Some of the most frequent forms of malpractice we evaluate include:
- Cancer Misdiagnosis or Delayed Diagnosis: This is one of the most widespread patterns in Kaiser cases. Patients often report early symptoms over months or even years, only to have them repeatedly written off. By the time proper scans or biopsies are finally authorized, cancers like breast, colon, lung, or prostate cancer have progressed to late stages, drastically reducing treatment options.
- Advice Nurse & Telephone Triage Failures: Kaiser relies heavily on automated call centers and telephone advice nurses to screen patient symptoms before authorizing an in-person doctor visit or emergency care. When call-center nurses follow rigid decision trees, fail to ask proper follow-up questions, or do not escalate urgent complaints to an attending physician, patients suffer severe, preventable harm at home.
- Emergency Room Negligence: Emergency departments at regional centers face intense crowding. ER malpractice often involves premature discharge of unstable patients, triage failures where critical cases sit too long in waiting rooms, evaluation by mid-level providers rather than board-certified emergency physicians, and a failure to recognize life-threatening emergencies like systemic sepsis, pulmonary embolisms, or acute appendicitis.
- Stroke & Cardiovascular Misdiagnosis: Primary care doctors and ER staff frequently mistake stroke symptoms for less severe issues like migraines, vertigo, inner-ear infections, or panic attacks. Missing these early warning signs can leave a patient with permanent, life-altering conditions.
- Labor & Delivery / Birth Injuries: Maternity unit mistakes often trace back to understaffing and inadequate patient monitoring. Common errors include failing to recognize fetal distress on heart-rate monitors, delaying necessary emergency C-sections, mismanaging shoulder dystocia during delivery, or failing to treat neonatal low blood sugar.
- Surgical & Anesthesia Errors: In the operating room, surgical mistakes include performing procedures on the wrong body part, accidentally cutting or puncturing surrounding organs and blood vessels, leaving surgical instruments or sponges inside the body, and failing to manage oxygen levels during anesthesia administration. Post-operative failure to monitor for dangerous internal bleeding or surgical site infections also accounts for major claims.
- Medication & Prescription Mistakes: Doctors may prescribe incorrect drug dosages, pharmacy staff can dispense the wrong medication entirely, or care teams may fail to check a patient’s medical history for known drug allergies or dangerous drug-to-drug interactions.
The Permanent Injuries That Can Result From Kaiser Negligence
At Vaage Law, our Kaiser malpractice cases have involved catastrophic injuries ranging from partial paraplegia and permanent brain damage to amputations and loss of bowel and bladder function. Other injuries that may result from delayed diagnoses, surgical errors, medication mistakes, and other failures in care include:
- Spinal cord injuries
- Paraplegia
- Quadriplegia
- Nerve damage
- Anoxic brain injuries
- Traumatic brain injuries
- Stroke and stroke-related injuries
- Seizures
- Cerebral palsy
- Birth injuries
- Erb’s palsy
- Developmental disabilities
- Amputations and loss of limbs
- Organ damage
- Respiratory injuries
- Bowel and intestinal injuries
- Bladder injuries
- Sepsis
- Severe infections
- Surgical complications
- Pulmonary embolism
- Pressure sores and bedsores
- Loss of vision
- Hearing loss
- Chronic pain
- Permanent nerve impairment
- Preventable cancer progression
- Wrongful death
What Could San Diego Kaiser Medical Malpractice Settlements Include?
Kaiser Permanente is known for requiring patients to sign arbitration agreements as a condition of receiving medical care. These agreements prevent patients from filing lawsuits against Kaiser in court, and instead require them to go through an arbitration process to resolve any disputes (see FAQ below on this page for more details regarding the steps of arbitration).
If you are involved in arbitration with Kaiser Permanente due to a medical malpractice claim, you can still recover the same types of damages as other forms of malpractice cases, including:
- Medical expenses and lost wages: This can include reimbursement for medical bills, hospital stays, and other expenses related to your injury. If your injury has caused you to miss work or lose income, you may be entitled to compensation for these losses.
- Pain and suffering compensation: You may also be entitled to compensation for the physical pain and emotional distress you have experienced due to your injury. Family members can pursue compensation for loss of companionship after a wrongful death.
- Punitive damages: In some cases, the arbitrator may include punitive damages, which are intended to punish Kaiser agents for their negligence and deter similar behavior in the future.
It is important to note that the specific terms of your settlement will depend on the facts of your case, the extent of your injuries, and the evidence presented during the arbitration process. Proof and calculation of damages are a complex aspect of arbitration in medical malpractice cases. The amount of damages recovered often depends on the skill and experience of the attorney handling the case.
This is why working with a proven Kaiser malpractice lawyer is essential — arbitration often favors the healthcare company, but an experienced lawyer can build a strong and effective case that beats the odds. You deserve to receive fair compensation for the harm you have suffered as well as future losses related to long-term injuries. Thus, it’s important to select an attorney who understands how to best maximize the damages recovered in Kaiser arbitration hearings.
Vaage Law’s Proven Kaiser Case Results
Our case results are evidence of the hard work and determination we apply to every case. Read how we have helped Kaiser patients in the past:
- $25,638,058.93 — Force Feeds Cause Bowel Perforation: In utero, a child was diagnosed with a congenital twisting of his bowels called atresia. He was force-fed formula by Kaiser medical staff, which led to a rupture of his bowels, sepsis, emergency surgery, and a profound brain injury due to lack of oxygen.
- $5,000,000 — Kaiser Arbitrator Awards Damages to Stroke Patient: Kaiser doctors failed to timely diagnose a developing carotid artery dissection resulting in a massive stroke and complications from disseminated intravascular coagulation leading to bilateral, below-the-knee amputations.
- $4,950,527 — Kaiser Arbitrator Awards Damages to Brain Injured Teen: Kaiser healthcare providers failed to recognize a dislodged endotracheal tube, leading to an anoxic brain injury in a 17-year-old stabbing victim.
- $3,469,778 — Kaiser Arbitrator Awards Damages to Partial Paraplegic: Kaiser doctors failed to timely recognize and treat a thoracic disc herniation, leading to partial paraplegia, loss of bowel and bladder function.
- $1,489,568 — Kaiser Arbitrator Awards Damages for Excessive Traction: Excessive traction by a Kaiser orthopedic surgeon during shoulder surgery caused a permanent brachial plexus injury to a woman’s arm and dominant hand.
We know what it takes to ensure Kaiser Permanente agencies and employees are held responsible for harm caused under their supervision.
What Is a Kaiser Arbitration Agreement?
As part of enrollment in the Kaiser healthcare system, each patient signs an agreement requiring members to forfeit their rights to a jury trial for medical malpractice and instead submit to the arbitration process. Rather than presenting the claim in the courtroom in front of a judge and jury, the parties present their case before either a panel of three arbitrators or one neutral arbitrator.
The Kaiser Arbitration System is managed by the Office of the Independent Administrator (OIA). One interesting web page at the OIA is the “Disclosure Table About Arbitration Awards Received in Past Five Years – Sortable.” You can see the amount the parties are claiming, the monetary awards or settlement (if any), names of attorneys, and neutral arbitrators. This information is mandated by California Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.96.
What to Do if You Suspect Kaiser Malpractice
If you believe a Kaiser doctor, nurse, surgeon, or other healthcare provider made a serious mistake that caused you or a loved one harm, what you do next can matter. Focus first on your health, then on preserving the information that may help establish what happened.
- Get the Medical Care You Need: If you are still experiencing symptoms or complications, see a qualified healthcare provider. Do not delay treatment while trying to determine whether malpractice occurred.
- Request Your Complete Medical Records: Ask for copies of medical records, including physician and nursing notes, medication records, discharge summaries, test results, imaging studies, operative reports, and other records related to your care. Preserve Your Own Evidence: Save appointment notices, prescriptions, bills, photographs, messages, emails, and written instructions from Kaiser.
- Write Down What You Remember: Record important dates, symptoms, conversations with healthcare providers, changes in your condition, and when you first learned that something may have gone wrong.
- Consider Getting a Second Opinion: Depending on the circumstances, an evaluation by a physician who was not involved in your Kaiser treatment may help identify the cause and extent of an injury.
- Be Careful About Recorded Statements and Releases: Kaiser or its representatives may contact you about an incident or injury. Before giving a recorded statement, signing a release, or accepting a settlement, consider speaking with a medical malpractice attorney about your rights.
- Talk to a Lawyer Early: California medical malpractice claims have strict deadlines, and Kaiser claims generally involve arbitration rather than a traditional lawsuit. Speaking with a San Diego Kaiser malpractice attorney early can help determine what happened, what evidence should be preserved, and whether a claim can still be pursued.
The Kaiser Arbitration Process: From Demand to Decision
Kaiser medical malpractice claims generally follow a different path than a traditional lawsuit. Instead of presenting your case to a judge and jury in court, the claim is handled through Kaiser’s arbitration system, which is administered by the Office of the Independent Administrator (OIA). The OIA is a neutral office that is separate from Kaiser, and its rules and California law govern the arbitration.
1. Serving the Demand for Arbitration
The process begins with a Demand for Arbitration. There is no required OIA form. A letter can serve as the Demand as long as it clearly states that it is a “Demand for Arbitration” and includes the basis of the claim, the amount of damages being sought, the claimant’s contact information, the attorney’s contact information if represented, and the correct legal names of the Kaiser entities being named as respondents.
For a Southern California Kaiser claim, the Demand is served on the appropriate Kaiser entities through:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
Legal Department
393 East Walnut Street
Pasadena, CA 91188
The correct Kaiser entities must be named and served. The OIA states that it has jurisdiction only over respondents who have actually been served, making this an important first step in the case.
The OIA’s current rules provide for a $150 filing fee, although the fee may be waived in qualifying circumstances. The fee does not necessarily have to accompany the initial Demand.
After the OIA receives the Demand from Kaiser, the claimant generally has 75 days to pay the filing fee or request a waiver.
2. Selecting the Neutral Arbitrator
After the arbitration begins, the parties select a neutral arbitrator. The OIA provides a List of Possible Arbitrators. The list contains neutral arbitrators from the appropriate geographic panel, including a San Diego panel, and the parties can review information about the proposed arbitrators. The parties may jointly agree on a neutral arbitrator or use the OIA’s ranking and striking process.
The OIA process allows each side to strike names from the list and rank the remaining candidates. The OIA then uses those rankings to select the neutral arbitrator. This makes the selection process an important part of preparing a Kaiser arbitration claim.
3. Arbitration Management Conference
Once the neutral arbitrator is selected, the case moves into case management. The Arbitration Management Conference addresses the claims and defenses, discovery, pending motions, settlement, and other procedural issues. The arbitrator also establishes important deadlines and sets the arbitration hearing date.
4. Discovery and Expert Investigation
Discovery gives both sides an opportunity to obtain information needed to prove or defend the claim. This can include requests for medical records and other documents, written questions, requests for admissions, subpoenas, and depositions of patients, healthcare providers, witnesses, and experts.
Medical malpractice cases also typically require qualified medical experts to explain the applicable standard of care, whether Kaiser’s care fell below that standard, and whether the medical error caused the claimed injury. The OIA itself notes that a medical expert is almost always necessary in a medical malpractice case.
5. Mandatory Settlement Meeting
Kaiser arbitration rules require the parties to participate in a Mandatory Settlement Meeting. The meeting must occur no later than six months after the Arbitration Management Conference, although the parties may discuss settlement before then. The neutral arbitrator does not participate in the settlement meeting.
A settlement can end the case without a hearing. If the parties cannot reach an agreement, the arbitration continues toward the hearing.
6. The Arbitration Hearing
If the case does not settle, the parties present their evidence at the arbitration hearing. There is no jury. Depending on the amount claimed and the parties’ choices under the OIA rules, the case may be heard by a single neutral arbitrator or by a panel that includes party arbitrators and a neutral arbitrator.
The attorneys present opening statements, introduce medical records and other evidence, question witnesses, cross-examine opposing witnesses, and present expert testimony. The arbitrator then considers the evidence and arguments before issuing a decision.
7. The Arbitration Award
The arbitrator’s decision is generally binding, which is one of the major differences between Kaiser arbitration and an ordinary civil lawsuit. The OIA rules also establish deadlines for closing cases. Under the current rules, a regular case generally must close within 18 months after the OIA receives the Demand and filing fee or grants a fee waiver, while complex cases may have a longer deadline.
Kaiser arbitration is not simply a shorter version of a courtroom lawsuit. Strict deadlines, expert requirements, and procedural rules can shape the outcome of your claim from the very beginning.
If you or a loved one suffered a spinal cord injury, permanent disability, loss of independence, or wrongful death after receiving care from Kaiser, call Vaage Law at (619) 338-0505 or fill out our online form today. Our team has extensive experience handling Kaiser malpractice arbitrations and can review what happened, explain your options, and help you determine what steps to take next.
How to Sue Kaiser Permanente: What Does a San Diego Kaiser Malpractice Attorney Need to Succeed?
The healthcare system known as “Kaiser” is made up of three entities: Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Southern California Permanente Medical Group (SCPMG), and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan.
In order to succeed in a Kaiser arbitration case, lawyers will need to possess several key qualities and skills, including:
- In-depth knowledge of medical malpractice law: Kaiser arbitration lawyers must have a strong understanding of medical malpractice laws and regulations, as well as the specific rules and procedures involved in Kaiser arbitration cases.
- Thorough investigation skills: A successful Kaiser arbitration lawyer must be skilled in investigating and gathering evidence to build a strong case on behalf of their client. This includes obtaining medical records, interviewing witnesses, and consulting with medical experts to develop a compelling case presentation.
- Strong negotiation skills: Lawyers must have strong negotiation skills to represent their clients effectively during the settlement negotiation process. This includes the ability to advocate for their client’s best interests, work collaboratively with opposing counsel, and arrive at a fair settlement agreement.
In summary, a successful Kaiser arbitration lawyer needs the necessary legal knowledge, investigative and negotiation skills, litigation experience, and communication skills for your particular case. They should also have the proven ability to work well under pressure to effectively represent their clients in these complex matters.
How Does a San Diego Kaiser Malpractice Attorney Benefit Your Case?
As with most medical malpractice claims, the lawyer for the injured party needs to demonstrate that Kaiser was negligent in rendering their treatment. This means proving that:
- The patient was owed a professional duty of care;
- Kaiser breached this duty of care in some manner;
- The breach of duty was the cause of the patient’s injuries; and
- The injuries resulted in damages that can be measured and calculated.
Healthcare providers like Kaiser must always provide treatment within the standard of care; this means they must apply the same level of skill and knowledge that a similar provider would reasonably utilize in the same circumstances. If they fail to exercise the appropriate standard of care, and that failure causes measurable injury to the patient, it may be considered medical malpractice.
Proving what the standard of care is and whether it was breached can be a complex matter that requires the explanation of an expert witness. At Vaage Law firm, we have the experience to handle such matters and have access to the top medical experts who can assist during trial.
Our malpractice arbitration attorneys can benefit your case against Kaiser in several ways, including:
- Investigation and evidence gathering: Your attorney can conduct a thorough investigation of your case, including gathering medical records, interviewing witnesses, and consulting with medical experts to build a strong case on your behalf.
- Case preparation: Your attorney can prepare a compelling case presentation for the arbitration panel, including expert witness testimony, exhibits, and other evidence to support your claim.
- Negotiation skills: Your attorney can negotiate with Kaiser Permanente on your behalf to reach a fair settlement agreement. They have the skills and experience needed to advocate for your best interests and obtain the compensation you deserve.
- Representation in arbitration: Your attorney can represent you during the arbitration process, presenting your case to the arbitration panel, cross-examining witnesses, and advocating for your best interests.
- Appellate representation: If the arbitration award is unfavorable, your attorney can represent you during the appeal process and fight for a just resolution of your case.
Our Kaiser malpractice lawyers have a deep understanding of the medical industry, including the laws and regulations that govern healthcare providers. We can investigate cases, gather evidence, and build a strong case against Kaiser, helping our clients to obtain the compensation they deserve.
Contact a Proven Kaiser Medical Malpractice Attorney
Kaiser medical malpractice arbitration proceedings are a highly technical and specific type of legal action. They involve many minute details that are different from a normal civil court trial.
The arbitration hearings require the knowledge and expertise of an attorney who has hands-on experience dealing with Kaiser, neutral arbitrators, and the overall process. A Kaiser arbitration lawyer can provide guidance, beginning with the Demand, and following all the way through to completion of the damages award calculations.
In our experience, the Kaiser hospital system’s medical malpractice generally stems from:
- Emergency physician negligence (failure to admit a patient)
- Surgical negligence
- Hospitalist/attending / ICU physician/nursing negligence
At Vaage Law, every single person in the firm works on your case. With almost 150 years of combined legal experience and more than $190 million recovered for our clients for medical malpractice and defective medical product cases, our case results speak for themselves. We are here to help get your life back on track.
You need an attorney who knows the rank and strike system, who the best neutral arbitrators are, and how to push your case through the Kaiser arbitration system. Contact us at (619) 338-0505 right away for a free, confidential, professional consultation — one call could be the first step to the justice you need.
Proud To Represent San Diego Residents
Kaiser Medical Malpractice Lawsuit FAQs
What should I know about Kaiser’s electronic medical records (EMRs)?
Kaiser healthcare providers rely on electronic medical records (EMRs) within its HealthConnect system. The problem we see with EMRs is threefold:
First, EMRs were originally designed for billing purposes and create a one-size-fits-all approach to unique medical classifications. Second, as a shortcut, doctors and nurses often cut and paste from past notes, creating a problem that we call “anchoring bias” — once a bad or incorrect diagnosis is entered into the EMR, it’s “anchored” on each subsequent record, which affects each doctor’s decision-making about your care. Third, what you receive as a “copy” of your electronic medical record is not the same view a healthcare provider sees and interfaces with when he or she is making a critical decision about your care.
It’s important that your attorney be very familiar with EMRs and their dangers when handling a Kaiser negligence case.
How many arbitrators are there in Kaiser medical malpractice arbitration proceedings, and how are they selected?
Generally, for disputes involving $200,0000 or less, the arbitration proceeding is heard by a single arbitrator. For cases involving more than $200,000 the arbitration may be heard by two-party arbitrators and one neutral arbitrator. Claimants who are entitled to select a Party Arbitrator may agree to waive this right by signing a Waiver of Party Arbitration form, which will make the arbitration before a single neutral arbitrator.
The selection of the neutral arbitrator is a vital step. The OIA will send a list of neutral arbitrators to the parties, and if the parties cannot or will not agree on the arbitrator, the parties are permitted to remove four names from a list and rank the remaining arbitrators in order of preference. The OIA will then assign an arbitrator based on those rankings.
We at Vaage Law have found that generally party arbitrators side with their party, leaving the neutral arbitrator to make the final decision. And although supposedly neutral, some arbitrators either favor Kaiser or historically tend to award less in damages. You need an attorney who knows this rank and strike system, who the best neutral arbitrators are, and how to push your case through the Kaiser arbitration system.
Can the results of a Kaiser arbitration proceeding be appealed?
In most cases, a Kaiser arbitration award may not be appealed or overturned. The results of these proceedings are intended to be final, and the awards carry as much authority as a final judgment would in a conventional trial.
However, there are rare circumstances where the results may be contested, such as where the arbitration result was obtained through fraud or corruption. We are aware of one Kaiser arbitration award that was reversed because of undisclosed communications between Kaiser’s counsel and the neutral arbitrator. These situations are rare, and the remedy in such instances is often to hold another arbitration proceeding.
How long do I have to file a Kaiser arbitration claim?
In California, in most cases, you have 1 year to file a medical malpractice claim. If that claim is made against a Kaiser Permanente employee or facility, your malpractice claim will be handled through an arbitration process instead of through traditional legal negotiation or trial. Contact Vaage Law at (619) 338-0505 for a free consultation — we can provide far more specific and actionable information once we evaluate your circumstances.
RECOGNIZED BY THE BEST






Medical Malpractice/Negligence
$25,300,000 - Force Feeds Cause Bowel Perforation
OUR CONTINGENCY FEES
No Fees Until We Recover
Unless we win your case, you don't have to worry about any fees and out-of-pocket legal expenses.
WHO WE ARE
Personal Attention for Injury Victims
We are ready to take on the most challenging personal injury and wrongful death cases.
WHY HIRE US
Award-Winning Attorney
Attorney Vaage has been most recently recognized as Outstanding Trial Attorney and Outstanding Trial Advocate by the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego.


